盤菜應該係反影做傳媒和記者的良心，之前做大傳媒但冇自由意志，之後做網媒但係就做到俾人告。
2個讚
正如上面所講，控告謀殺罪嘅門檻係好高（有預謀、殺人動機）
我哋觀眾視覺同當時庭上嘅證據已經好唔同
我記得真實案件當時嘅判決，但睇完套戲依然覺得震撼。
好多嘢諗，好多嘢想傾 
以我理解佢俾人告係審訊期間嗰篇報導，法官有提過妨礙司法公正
1個讚
好呀, 唔該曬你
我都明白套戲既主題, 如果只有少少血腥我最多遮住對眼
但太多血腥不如唔好睇 
我都唔想水咗你入去, 到頭來驚多過enjoy套戲 
始終每人接受程度唔同, 可以聽多啲睇咗嘅朋友feedback再考慮入唔入場啦~
唔算太多血腥, 因為唔係賣點, D鏡頭係紅色一PAT嘢咁, 行兇過程都唔係影到實 (反而係影D人反應), 我覺得可以接受
好睇，我最初都驚睇血腥而1516睇唔睇好，最後選擇入場，每個演員都好好演技，都同意希特拉的剪接位稍為多咗，但套戲的張力都好好，而且d對白真係好令人難忘
睇返單案判肥仔刑果PART, 個官講到明同意JURY 9:0 (官咁講係好RARE嘅情況) , 證明如果只講呈堂證供嚟講呢個係唯一合理判決
This jury has unanimously found you not guilty of murder, all nine of them, and I do not often make a comment about a jury’s verdict because it is not my place to do so, but if anyone suggests you were guilty of murder and got away with it, you just tell them that the judge also agreed with the verdict of the jury. I am absolutely in no doubt whatsoever that the verdict is correct. Of course, there was some evidence for the jury to consider and they have done so with the verdict you know about.
1個讚
題外話
法官認為陪審團做得好, 而且要面對咁多驚嚇嘅相, 特別俾咗double pay佢地。
反正想知, 現實肥仔釋放之後有接受雜誌專訪, 用意係乜?
執返身彩唔係應該隱姓埋名咩? 呢個行為太高調。
*******未睇套戲嘅唔好click 呢條link. ********
話時話呢套戲睇得出BUDGET真係TIGHT, 成套戲有成一半時間都喺COURT ROOM, 但都唔能夠AFFORD 一比一搭個場景出嚟, HIGH COURT 應該無一個COURT ROOM係照到陽光, 陪審團亦唔會排排坐到咁迫, 呢方面代入感爭D
不過咁樣反而電影感更強, 如果用真實COURTROOM 啲白燈拍出嚟可能似電視劇
好似話喺粉嶺裁判法院拍。
好鍾意佢啲燈光設計, 例如表姐作供有spot light focus喺對眼係寓意告解, 好fit
又好喜歡審判過程穿插不同場景, e.g. 茶餐廳、兇案現場…etc
好正好有feel
4個讚
其實我GET唔到, 不過都覺得好特別
窗外面嘅天氣表達雖然個IDEA有啲老套, 但係都好恰當嘅
thanks arrrr 因為見佢係三級, 所以諗佢係咪勁血腥
咁我應該OK呀, 買飛先 
我都get唔到, 係睇返影評先知
但都覺得: wow!
我都覺得應該係D規模細D嘅COURT ROOM拍, 我開頭以為係西區裁判法院
穿插D場景有舞台劇FEEL, JURY好似親歷其境咁, 我鍾意大排檔果PART, 同樣對白真係兩邊講都通, 有D思考空間
有好血腥既位，因始終呢宗係謀殺案，但佔比吾算多，我都有啲位要掩住隻眼，但又忍吾住爭半隻眼睇
其實我覺得根本成套戲就係巳根據巳知既事實去做，結局個仔有罪肥仔無罪大家都知，吾算咩劇透。主要套戲係表現過程。所以一定要睇套戲一路走來，各人表達不同立場，而形成最後個結果先至係最引人入勝嘅地方。
1個讚
佢係加拿大讀書長大回流，佢國語都好正宗添，好似媽係北京人。所以真正兩文三語都掂。其實我覺得佢肋手龍小菌都算講得吾錯啦！