見到隔離登有post問obamagate點解會trending

香港人唔會咁、咁講可信d
一年前遊行警民關係都唔係咁、難以想像

簡單講下最近多trump支持者retweet的一篇文。

眾所周知,上年反送中期間Trump經受左一次荒謬的impeachment,當時彈劾的理由就係佢施壓烏政府調查biden同Burisma Holdings(一間有犯罪紀錄的nature gas firm)之間的聯繫,為左尋找證據,甚至不惜炒埋美國駐烏大使Yovanovitch(因此彈劾會搵佢testimony)。睇起身,trump完全一個加害者的角色,biden成左個可憐蟲。

點知最近有文件披露,上年向國會testimony的Yovanovitch作左偽證!!!

“What do you know about the investigation of Burisma?” Yovanovitch was asked at one point during her October testimony.

“Not very much. And, again, that happened before I arrived,” she testified. “… Burisma wasn’t a big issue in the fall of 2018 — 2016 when I arrived.”

“Were you aware at that time of Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma?” she was asked at another point.

“Yes. As I mentioned, I became aware during the Q&A in the prep for my testimony,” she answered.

當時佢作證話唔知biden個仔hunter同呢間公司有乜關聯。但事實上早係2016年佢就知Hunter Biden係公司董事,甚至佢本人仲有公司高層来往甚密,係大使館啲員工都知道Burisma到底係乜回事。

The discussions about Burisma inside Yovanovitch’s embassy were so extensive, in fact, that they filled more than 160 pages of emails, memos and correspondence in fall 2016 alone, according to the State Department records obtained under FOIA by the conservative group Citizens United.

Burisma點解咁重要,其實就係一個俾biden個仔尋租貪腐的缺口,biden係obama政府時任副總統時負責管對烏政策,習慣收錢收到手軟的奶共分子有乜可能唔乘機掠水?靠的就係Burisma,等佢個仔入去做董事,biden只需要利用政府的特權稍微搞下,無盡的利益,無盡的財富,so easy…

而呢種見唔得光的操作,駐烏大使Yovanovitch自然成左關鍵知情人,甚至係團伙骨幹。所以當佢作證時話唔知道間公司係乜料?咪玩喇。

Trump早就知道呢啲事,當佢一打算調查,炒左Yovanovitch後(上年5月),呢班人就急了,驚東窗事發,貪腐醜聞一煲大,biden就會收皮。所以怍怍霖,快快趣,搞左呢個彈劾鬧劇。即使唔可以成功overset到Trump,至少都可以將biden塑造成一個victim,同時又可以cover up到Trump本來要調查的關於Burisma背後牽涉到的黑幕。

呢啲就係呢班人的邏輯。為左掩飾罪行,反而先encapsulate自己成一個悲慘的弱者,裝可憐,博同情。一可以有助於discredit本來要揭發自己的敵人,另一可以有利於繼續將啲唔見得光嘅野隱瞞落去。

2個讚

fox都出左篇,講呢個大使究竟識得公司乜人

完全係對國會作偽證,Perjury。有冇拉?點解mainstream media冇人講?亦都說明呢班奶共集團幾龐大。

擺明砌生豬肉屈現任總統(美國史上從冇咁誇張的事),冇任何證據都可以啟動impeachment ,甚至圖謀失敗埋,居然到依家都仲冇一個人受到追究,甚至最核心的犯罪當事人仲可以安然無恙選緊總統!!!

2個讚

Trump對obamagate又發推

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/15/state-department-inspector-general-fired-261536

當好多人以為Trump的obamagate只係炒作陰謀論時,佢已經開始做野,炒左個obama時期已經在任的Inspector General。奶共集團好嬲好嬲,pelosi咁話:

“The president’s late-night, weekend firing of the State Department inspector general has accelerated his dangerous pattern of retaliation against the patriotic public servants charged with conducting oversight on behalf of the American people," Pelosi said in an statement. “Inspector General Linick was punished for honorably performing his duty to protect the Constitution and our national security, as required by the law and by his oath.”

當然,主流媒體繼續downplay

終於睇晒, 真係好精彩, 不過由於對呢方面冇乜知識, 所以只能夠當係增加下見聞
想請問下, 喺美國邊啲新聞相對係中立同可信性大啲?

2個讚

主流媒體基本係反trump的,支持trump的只有fox。不過佢地報導國外的,尤其香港場運動,好多都好中立好客觀,完美地展現佢地的專業性。尤其Reuters爆香港的料,好準。

1個讚

呢篇野雖然反trump,不過有句話值得讀

His departure is likely to further deepen morale problems that have festered at State since the start of the Trump administration, when many career diplomats found themselves shunted aside and cast as a “deep state” bent on undermining Trump.

究竟乜係deep state,其實唔神秘,就係一個反trump集團。點解要反trump?因為奶共,收受慣中共利益,收錢收到手軟,停唔到,依家有個反共總統要斷佢地米路,搶佢地飯碗,有乜可能會容忍?所以動用一切資源,千方百計,苦心經營,就係為反trump。本質就係一班藍絲,純粹為利益而行動。

咁我多啲留意FOX 先, THX, 對我黎講,新聞中立客觀,保持專業性已經好足夠,
始終點分析應該係靠自己
好認同 REUTERS D 料準, 真係十之八九都好可信

1個讚
1個讚

副國安顧問叫博明 (Matt Pottinger) 佢國語好好 CV重吸引 做個記者 當個軍 仲要比共產黨打過
雖然都係叫Matt, 但睇相同文字應不是他
https://buzzorange.com/2019/09/27/matt-pottinger-is-us-new-national-security-vice-adviser/

1個讚

有冇link?我都想睇睇

仲有pelosi死咁插trump太過針對中共,呢班人都係一伙嘅

係呀,我有睇佢講五四運動用國語講,但無啦啦有個似佢嘅account. 應該係冒牌了

原來你就係講佢,我都有睇佢呢段,講得好好。我知道佢暗示希望大陸人生性啲,快啲起來反抗共產黨,不過冇用,根本係對牛彈琴。但都冇所謂,佢呢番講話已經定晒調Trump係一定會反共反到底,唔可能退。

講呢D 同睇大紀元中共權鬥有乜分別:joy:

其實係John Bolton在位個時,整個Trump政府的重心係中東,因為bolton本來就係為挑起中東大戰而存在。同期trump一直深陷通俄門的糾纏。背後的邏輯,就係奶共集團希望係中東挑起戰火,引發美俄之間大戰。bolton就係為呢件事而坐個位。

捱過呢幾年,bolton失敗,連Russiagate都玩完,trump於是開始反擊,trump政府的重心轉向亞太,就係為反共。所點解繼任的Robert O’Brien同Matt Pottinger都有好強的亞洲屬性?

no coincidence…本來反共就係Trump上台的根本任務。只不過係班奶共集團迫使trump政府前幾年將精力spin左去中東,試圖誘導佢同普京擦槍走火,爆發沖突。當trump一消耗盡Russiagate的Momentum,就終於可以回到正軌,全力反共了。

所以香港同台灣係跟住落黎的幾年都有角色,只要真心用心反共,美國會撐。但最好唔好一下子奢望會派兵接管香港。

係末日到來前,打發下時間喈,否則日日哭哭啼啼?

1個讚

真係望Trump唔好早死,
唔好中武肺,
千祈唔好早死過雜種。

2個讚

令我諗翻佢之前放料俾Reuters,講佢有向過上邊建議撤回法案,不過習總唔批。reuters爆出來後,純粹就係落習總面